|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ASA ACCUGRADE, INC.,
a Florida Corporation
P.O. Box 915103
Longwood, Florida 32791
Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 1:04-cv-02213-RWR
v.
AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION,
a Federally Chartered Non-Profit Association,
HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, a
foreign corporation, COLLECTOR’S UNIVERSE, INC.,
a foreign corporation d/b/a Professional Coin
Grading Service, PROFESSIONAL
NUMISMATISTS GUILD, INDUSTRY COUNCIL
FOR TANGIBLE ASSETS, BARRY STUPPLER & CO., INC.
a foreign corporation, NU GRADE, LLC, a foreign limited
liability company f/k/a TRU GRADE SERVICES,
and REC.COLLECTING.COINS a/k/a RCC,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
COMPLAINT
COMES NOW Plaintiff, ASA ACCUGRADE, INC., a Florida
corporation, by and through its undersigned counsel, and
sues Defendants, AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION, a
Federally Chartered Non-Profit Association, HERITAGE
CAPITAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation,
COLLECTOR’S UNIVERSE, INC., a foreign corporation
d/b/a Professional Coin Grading Service, PROFESSIONAL
NUMISMATISTS GUILD, INDUSTRY COUNCIL FOR TANGIBLE
ASSETS, BARRY STUPPLER & CO., INC., a foreign
corporation, NU GRADE, LLC, a foreign limited liability
company f/k/a TRU GRADE SERVICES, and
REC.COLLECTING.COINS a/k/a RCC, and alleges as follows:
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This is an action for damages and injunctive
relief brought pursuant to the provisions of the Clayton
Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26) based on Defendants’
violations of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2)
that have and continue to harm competition in the rare
coin grading and authentication industry and to cause
grave and irreparable injury to Plaintiff.
PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
2. Plaintiff, ASA ACCUGRADE, INC. (“ACG”) is a
Florida corporation organized and operating under the
laws of the State of Florida with its principal place of
business located in Longwood, Florida. ACG has been
incorporated and engaged in the rare coin grading and
authentication business in the State of Florida since
1995 and before that in the State of Connecticut since
1984.
3. Defendant, AMERICAN NUMISMATIC ASSOCIATION
(“ANA”) is a federally chartered not-for-profit
Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) entity that acts as a
quasi-governmental body over numismatic collectors and
dealers and wields great influence in the industry. In
addition, the ANA provides a forum for resolving
complaints against it members and disputes between its
members. The President of ACG was a life member of the
ANA in good standing until she resigned in April 2003 as
a result of Defendants’ antitrust activities. The ANA
is headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado but does
business throughout the United States, including in the
District of Columbia. The President of the ANA is Gary
E. Lewis and its Executive Director is Christopher
Cippoletti. During all times material hereto, Barry
Stuppler and Michael S. Fey were members of the ANA’s
Board of Governors and in March 2003 Stuppler was
Chairman of the ANA’s Consumer Protection Committee.
4. Defendant, HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION
(“HERITAGE”) is a Texas corporation that does
business throughout the United States, including in the
District of Columbia, as a rare coin dealer and
auctioneer. The founders and principals of HERITAGE are
R. Steven Ivey and James L. Halperin. In March 2003,
Gregory Rohan represented himself publicly as President
of HERITAGE.
5. COLLECTOR’S UNIVERSE, INC. d/b/a Professional
Coin Grading Service (“PCGS”) is a Delaware
corporation with its headquarters located in the State
of California that is in the business of grading rare
domestic and international coins throughout the United
States, including in the District of Columbia. PCGS is a
competitor of ACG. David Hall is the founder and
President of PCGS and the President of COLLECTOR’S
UNIVERSE, INC. PCGS has hundreds of “featured
dealers” and “authorized dealers” throughout the
country, including HERITAGE and BARRY STUPPLER & CO.
INC. which are both “featured” and “authorized”.
6. PROFESSIONAL NUMISMATISTS GUILD (“PNG”) is an
Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) organization of rare
coin dealers that consists primarily of PCGS “featured
and/or authorized dealers”. R. Steven Ivy, President
of HERITAGE, is a member of the Board of Directors of
PNG. The Executive Director of PNG is Robert Brueggeman.
PNG operates throughout the United States, including in
the District of Columbia.
7. INDUSTRY COUNCIL FOR TANGIBLE ASSETS (“ICTA”)
is an Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) organization
that holds itself out as being the “National Trade
Association” for the rare coin industry. R. Steven
Ivey, President of HERITAGE, Christopher Cippoletti,
Executive Director of the ANA, and Barry Stuppler of
BARRY STUPPLER & CO., INC. are members of the Board
of Directors of ICTA. The Executive Director of ICTA is
Eloise Ullman. ITCA operates throughout the United
States, including in the District of Columbia.
8. BARRY STUPPLER & CO., INC. (“STUPPLER &
CO.”) is a California corporation that does business
throughout the United States, including in the District
of Columbia. STUPPLER is a competitor of ACG as it
specializes in coin appraisal and grading services.
Barry Stuppler is the owner and operator of STUPPLER and
was one of the founders of PCGS.
9. NU GRADE, LLC (“NU GRADE”), is a Pennsylvania
limited liability company formerly known as TRU GRADE
SERVICES that does business throughout the United
States, including in the District of Columbia. NU GRADE
is a competitor of ACG as it specializes in coin grading
and authentication services. John Callandrello is the
owner and operator of NU GRADE.
10. REC.COLLECTING.COINS a/k/a RCC is an ANA
sanctioned coin club and Internet users newsgroup
consisting of coin dealers and collectors headed up by
GARY E. LEWIS, MARK GREENE, BRUCE HICKMOTT, IRA STEIN
and ERIC TILLERY. RCC is broadcast over the Internet
internationally, including in the District of Columbia.
The other documented members of RCC are JOHN BAUMGART,
JOHN P. CARNEY, JASON S. CRATON, PETER T. DAVIS, TOM
DeLOREY, PHILLIP DEMAYO, JR., MICHAEL S. FEY, ROBERT A.
FLAMINIO, REID GOLDSBOROUGH, ALAN HERBERT, WILLIAM A.
KRUMMEL, EDWARD KUSZMAR, BARRY KUTNER, HARVEY R. LASER,
GREG MARGULIES, SAMUEL L. MORGAN, STUART J. MILLER, FRED
A. MURPHY, DAVID W. PARRISH, DONN PEARLMAN, TOM REA,
BYRON L. REED, PAUL J. ROBERTS, JONATHAN ROSENTHAL, WILL
ROSSMAN, STUART SEGAN, JEFFREY SALTZMAN, SCOTT
STEVENSON, JOHN STONE, BARRY STUPPLER, ALAN WILLIAMS,
CHYRSTA WILSON, DOUGLAS A. WINTER, PETER ZIMMERMAN, and
DAVID M. ZUTS.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
11. Beginning in 1995, ACG incorporated in the State
of Florida and has provided superior coin grading and
authentication services to rare coin dealers and
collectors throughout the United States and Canada,
including in the District of Columbia. ACG has never had
any major complaints since its inception.
12. From in or about 1999 until in or about 2001, ACG
gradually increased its share in the marketplace of
entities that provided rare coin grading and
authentication services to rare coin dealers and
collectors throughout North America. By in or about June
2001, ACG enjoyed an approximate eight (8%) percent
share in the overall relevant market pertaining to rare
coin grading and authentication services in the United
States. The eight (8%) percent share was comprised of a
twelve (12%) percent share of the E-Bay coin market and
a fifty (50%) percent share of the major coin trade show
market.
13. ACG’s gradual increase in market share and
corresponding profitability came at the expense of PCGS,
HERITAGE, PNG, ICTA, and STUPPLER inasmuch as its
increase in market share was the result of its superior
pricing and efficiency in providing rare coin grading
and authentication services to dealers and collectors
throughout the marketplace. This was particularly true
in the major coin trade show market as ACG began to
focus on that market in 2000 and ultimately obtained
one-half of the market share pertaining to major coin
trade shows.
14. Commencing in or about 2001, Defendants, ANA,
PCGS, HERITAGE, PNG, ICTA, STUPPLER, and RCC, in an
effort to drive ACG out of business for the primary
purpose of destroying competition in the marketplace,
entered into an agreement to defame ACG and tortiously
interfere with its advantageous business relationships
with its dealers and customers (hereinafter referred to
as the antitrust conspiracy).
15. Subsequent to entering into the antitrust
conspiracy, the Defendants committed a myriad of illicit
and overt acts in an effort to further the primary
purpose of the antitrust conspiracy (i.e.,
anti-competition) including, but not limited to:
- RCC and PCGS published Internet websites and
engaged in various forms of Internet communications
that contained false and disparaging statements
about ACG, its President, and its head grader;
- RCC and STUPPLER proposed, organized, and carried
out a group boycott of ACG products and services;
- RCC created a “legal defense fund’” to
respond to correspondence from ACG’s attorney
urging Defendants to cease and desist their
anticompetitive conduct;
d. ANA attempted to disallow ACG from bringing its
coin slabbing equipment to ANA coin shows, attempted to
bar ACG’s head grader from attending trade shows, and
located ACG’s table in the least advantageous
locations at the trade shows;
- RCC and STUPPLER, with the assistance and
complicity of DAVID KREAMER and ROBERT K. BRUCE,
knowingly submitted counterfeit coin(s) to ACG for
the purpose of attempting to deceive it into
violating the law and causing an unwarranted
complaint to be submitted to the ANA;
- ANA and STUPPLER made unwarranted complaints
against ACG and its head grader to the ANA
resulting in the ANA attempting to deny ACG
“bourse” space at ANA coin shows;
- PNG, ITCA, PCGS, HERITAGE, ANA and STUPPLER
concocted “bogus” PNG/ICTA coin grading
surveys in 2002 and 2004 and publicized the
illegitimate results of the “survey”;
- PNG, PCGS, HERITAGE, and STUPPLER formed a PNG
“Internet Rules Committee” made up of R.
Steven Ivy, Douglas A. Winter and Barry Stuppler,
among others, in direct response to the immense
popularity of the ACG sponsored coin grading
Internet website and catalogue known as “I 2
Collect.Com” which fostered true competition
among the various coin grading services;
i. RCC and ANA caused RCC to become an official ANA
member coin club and ANA President Gary E. Lewis paid
its ANA dues;
- RCC, STUPPLER, and PNG published ACG dealers’
network on the Internet and thereafter attacked ACG
dealers systematically until they ceased doing
business with ACG; and
- NU GRADE, through its principal, John Callandrello,
made false and disparaging statements about ACG
before the ANA.
16. Beginning in 2001 and continuing thereafter
through the present date, in furtherance of the
antitrust conspiracy, Defendants RCC and PCGS began a
campaign of defamation against ACG, its President, Diane
Hager, and its head grader, Alan Hager. The campaign
consisted of the publication of false and disparaging
statements made by RCC members, via its Internet user
newsgroup, and PCGS, through its message board, about
ACG and the Hagers that are far too numerous to list.
However, such statements include, but are not limited
to:
- IRA STEIN’S statement that ACG “knowingly
grades ‘counterfeit’ coins, and ‘fakes’”;
- MARK GREENE’S statement that ALAN HAGER is a
“blatant crook”;
- BYRON L. REED’S statement that DIANE HAGER is a
“whore” and those who deal with ACG are her
“johns”;
- IRA STEIN’S statement that ACG was sued for
committing “fraud” against an elderly 80+ year
old woman by selling her over-graded coins;
- BRUCE HICKMOTT’S and FRED MURPHY’S statement
that DIANE HAGER is a “screaming fishwife”;
- BYRON L. REED’S statement that ALAN HAGER has
been “found liable for misrepresenting coins”;
- ERIC TILLERY’S statement that ALAN HAGER was
“proven to be a fraud -- once a fraud, always a
fraud”;
- REID GOLDSBOROGH’S statement that “many people
get cheated by ACG every day”;
- REID GOLDSBOROGH’S statement that there is a
“huge repository of evidence…that [ACG’S] very
business model is based on deception and
cheating”;
- BRUCE HICKMOTT’S statement that “ACG is
knowingly providing a tool that others are using
with intent to defraud”;
- GREGORY ROHAN’S statement that ACG is
“basically a fraud;”
- GREGORY ROHAN’S statement that “ I have lost
track of the number of counterfeit coins I have seen
in ACG holders”;
- BARRY STUPPLER’S statement that “ coins in ACG
holders can be 2 to 6 grades lower” and “have no
liquidity”;
- JOHN a/k/a dog_xx, Dog97, Dog (ME)’s statement
that ACG’s President was arrested in Longwood,
Florida for same-sex prostitution; and
- BARRY STUPPLER and MICHAEL S. FEY’S statement
that ACG’s head grader is a convicted felon and
has spent time in jail.
17. In or about 2004, ACG initiated legal action in
Circuit Court for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of the
State of Florida against several individual RCC members
for defamation and tortious interference based on, among
other things, statements published as part of the
aforementioned internet users newsgroup. Once this
action was commenced and as part of and in furtherance
of the antitrust conspiracy, the ANA created an
unprecedented legal defense fund for the individual
defendants in order to obstruct ACG from vindicating its
rights and restoring true competition to the rare coin
grading industry.
18. Thereafter, Defendants ANA and STUPPLER agreed,
as part of and in furtherance of the antitrust
conspiracy, to publish a patently false and damaging
“advertisement” in the July and August, 2004 issues
of ANA’s monthly magazine, “The Numismatist” that
further severely disparaged ACG and insured that it
would continue to be unable to provide rare coin dealers
and collectors with economical, fair, and competitive
coin grading and authentication services or to restore
its market share in the coin grading and authentication
industry.
19. The natural and proximate effect of the illicit
agreement and overt acts of the Defendants as set forth
above was to diminish competition in the coin grading
and authentication marketplace by removing ACG’s
market share and allowing PCGS to increase its market
share to the point where it exclusively controls prices
in the market. Defendants, ANA, HERITAGE, PNG, ICTA,
STUPPLER, and NU GRADE, have all benefited from the
diminishment of ACG’s market share and the boycott of
ACG that have resulted from the antitrust conspiracy and
substantive antitrust violations engaged in by
Defendants.
20. A secondary but equally devastating cause of the
antitrust conspiracy and substantive antitrust
violations is the grave economic injury suffered by ACG
in that it has literally lost millions of dollars in
revenue and profits as the result of Defendants’
anticompetitive conduct.
21. ACG has retained the undersigned attorneys and
has agreed to pay them a reasonable fee for their
services.
COUNT ONE-CIVIL CONSPIRACY TO
COMMIT SHERMAN
ACT VIOLATIONS (ANTITRUST CONSPIRACY)
(ALL DEFENDANTS)
22. This is an action for civil conspiracy to commit
violations of the Sherman Act on the part of the
Defendants.
23. Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs 1-21
above as though fully set forth herein.
24. Commencing in or about 2001, the Defendants
combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed to engage
in acts that constitute per se violations of the
Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2) as set forth in
paragraphs 14-18, above. This conspiratorial agreement
caused antitrust injury in that it harmed competition in
the rare coin grading and authentication industry by
destroying ACG’s measurable market share, particularly
in the “trade show” portion of the industry.
25. ACG has suffered severe economic damage as a
direct and proximate result of the antitrust conspiracy.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff, ASA ACCUGRADE, INC.,
respectfully requests that the Court enter a judgment in
its favor and against the Defendants, jointly and
severally, that:
a. prohibits the Defendants from carrying out any
additional acts in furtherance of the antitrust
conspiracy;
b. awards Plaintiff three times the amount of the
pecuniary damages it has suffered;
c. awards Plaintiff the reasonable attorneys’ fees
and costs it has incurred in initiating and prosecuting
this action; and
d. provides such other and further relief as the
Court deems just and proper.
COUNT TWO-SUBSTANTIVE SHERMAN ACT
VIOLATIONS
(ALL DEFENDANTS)
26. This is an action for violations of the Sherman
Act on the part of the Defendants.
27. Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraph 1-20,
above as though fully set forth herein.
28. Commencing in or about 2001, the Defendants
engaged in various acts and conduct that constitutes
violations of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2).
29. The Defendants’ antitrust violations are set
out in detail in paragraphs 14-18, above. These acts
constitute per se antitrust violations and have
resulted in the eradication of ACG’s market share
thereby significantly harming competition in the rare
coin grading and authentication industry.
30. ACG has suffered severe economic injury as a
direct and proximate result of Defendants’ antitrust
violations.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff, ASA ACCUGRADE, INC.,
respectfully requests that the Court enter a judgment in
its favor and against the Defendants, jointly and
severally, that:
- prohibits the Defendants from carrying out any
additional antitrust acts;
b. awards Plaintiff three times the amount of the
pecuniary damages it has suffered;
c. awards Plaintiff the reasonable attorneys’ fees
and costs it has incurred in initiating and prosecuting
this action; and
d. provides such other and further relief as the
Court deems just and proper.
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
In accordance with Rule 38, Fed.R.Civ.P., Plaintiff,
ASA ACCUGRADE, INC. hereby demands a trial by jury of
all issues so triable.
DATED this day of
December, 2004.
Respectfully Submitted,

HARRISON T. SLAUGHTER, ESQUIRE
Florida Bar No. 194822
Leventhal & Slaughter
111 N. Orange Ave., Ste. 700
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-849-6161
Facsimile: 407-843-03738

DANIEL N. BRODERSEN, ESQUIRE
Florida Bar No.: 0664197
BOGIN, MUNNS, & MUNNS
2601 Technology Drive
Orlando, Florida 32804
Telephone: (407) 578-1334
Facsimile: (407) 578-2801
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ASA ACCUGRADE
|